HIMS to offer Liraglutide after shortage rule changes

HIMS leans into Liraglutide as a replacement for Semaglutide in the face of shortage rule changes. Is it good enough?

HIMS to offer Liraglutide after shortage rule changes
HIMS corporate logo

Earlier this year when the active peptide (Tirzepatide) in popular GLP1 Receptor Agonists Mounjaro and Zepbound was taken off the FDA shortage list, companies were forced to act quickly:

Shortage ends for Eli Lilly (Mounjaro, Zepbound)
Bad news that sounds like good news: FDA ends shortage Eli Lilly’s GLP-1 (Tirzepatide). We’ll tell you why that’s bad news.

While the a large consortium of compounders effectively lobbied (and sued) the FDA into avoiding restrictions on compounding, other companies that provide GLP1s became wary and have now started trying to change their supply lines.

Who can manufacture GLP1s like Semaglutide and Tirzepatide?

Right now, there are essentially only two companies that can manufacture GLP1 Receptor Agonists – Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk.

This isn't completely true of course – there are many other popular GLP1 Receptor Agonists that work in a similar way that can be substituted, but as far as the most popular formulations (Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy, Mounjaro, Zepbound), these are produced by just the two above companies.

🍃
Don't know what a GLP1 Receptor Agonist is, or how drugs like Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy, or Zepbound work?

Check out our quick explainer

Compounders were able to start creating formulations of the drugs because of the FDA declared shortage on Tirzepatide and Semaglutide. This came into question with Tirzepatide being taken off the shortage list, but the FDA's note on reconsidering the list removal (and pledge to not pursue legal action against compounders) enabled compounders to continue for an indefinite while longer:

FDA reconsidering Tirzepatide shortage list removal
After legal action by a group of compounders, the FDA is reviewing their removal of Tirzepatide (Mounjaro, Zepbound) from the shortage list.

Clearly, this isn't sustainable – compounders cannot depend on being able to produce drugs that are not on the shortage list.

Things could get even worse – the FDA could remove Semaglutide from the shortage list. This means that compounders would have effectively no options on producing the most popular GLP1 agonist formulations.

What is HIMS doing about the potential restrictions?

There's one ray of hope – Liraglutide (also known as Victoza/Saxenda).

Liraglutide's patent protection recently elapsed, which means a large company like TEVA Pharmaceuticals can make a generic – and they did:

Victoza Generic GLP1 launched by Teva Pharmaceuticals
Teva Pharmaceuticals has started manufacturing a Victoza generic drug (liraglutide), and it’s available inside the United States.

HIMS has announced plans to get ahead of the restrictions – by switching to Liraglutide instead:

Hims switching to Liraglutide article (source: Reuters)

The company is already starting the media churn/getting it's customers used to the new formulation:

Liraglutide vs Semiglutide comparison webpage

Clearly, this is going to be the way forward for many firms that depend on compounding pharmacies. As Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk regain their rights to be the sole producers of GLP1s, companies that compound will have to switch to versions of GLP1s that are not patent-encumbered.

The problem with this is that Liraglutide isn't as good as Semaglutide.

How do Liraglutide and Semaglutide compare?

A recently published clinical study shows that Liraglutide is about half as effective as Semaglutide:

One-Year Weight Reduction With Semaglutide or Liraglutide in Clinical Practice - PubMed
In this retrospective cohort study of 3389 patients with obesity, weight reduction at 1 year was associated with the medication’s active agent, its dosage, treatment indication, persistent medication coverage, and patient sex. Future research should focus on identifying the reasons for discontinuati …

The study is fairly large, and the results were stark:

Results: A total of 3389 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.4 [12.2] years; 1835 [54.7%] female) were identified. Of these, 1341 patients received semaglutide for T2D; 1444, liraglutide for T2D; 227, liraglutide for obesity; and 377, semaglutide for obesity. Mean (SD) percentage weight change at 1 year was -5.1% (7.8%) with semaglutide vs -2.2% (6.4%) with liraglutide (P < .001); -3.2% (6.8%) [..]

Will consumers continue to choose a formulation that's half as effective? Will manufacturers like TEVA and companies like HIMS attempt to fund research into making Liraglutide more effective? Only time will tell.

Share on Tumblr
Share on Pinterest
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Reddit