Eli Lilly suing GLP1 compounders & related companies
Eli Lilly sues many compounding-related companies in an effort to clear the market of compounded GLP1.

Compounding GLP1s is now almost effectively a thing of the past. Companies like HIMS which heavily depended on compounding for cheap supply of GLP1s no longer offer it as an option:

Eli Lilly is taking this one step further and suing many corporations involved GLP1 compounding, including some TeleHealth providers:
- Aios Inc
- Capitol Contours
- Houston Weight Loss Centers of Texas
- Cleveland Health Group
- Lucy’s Laser & MedSpa
- Aequita Corporation
- Willow Health Services
- Adonis Health
What products are linked to the companies being sued?
It's a bit difficult to tell at a glance which providers correspond to which companies so we'll lay them out below:
- Fella Health (Aios Inc)
- Delilah (Aios Inc)
- Mochi Health (Aequita Corporation)
- Willow Health
- HenryMeds (Adonis Health)
Other corporations being sued
Metabolic MD is also facing a lawsuit for trademark infringement and false advertising amongst other claims:

Another plaintiff is one person in particular – Stuart Lerner of Hawai'i:

Stuart created a website called "Mounjaro Hawaii" which happens to sell compounded (rather than official) Tirzepatide.
The facts seem stacked in Eli Lilly's favor on this case, but it has yet to play out (and things like a settlement may well happen).
Clearly Eli Lilly is doing what it can to protect it's brand names (as any company might be expected to), but also cracking down on those who might still try to profit from compounded GLP1s.
Have any cases been concluded?
Some cases have concluded already, in particular a case last year when Eli Lilly settled with a Spa in South Carolina:

While the agreed-upon terms of the settlement do not seem too onerous (there were no significant monetary sums), there is definitely a chilling effect (which is likely warranted at this point, since shortage is over) on firms that might do something similar.
Do compounders have any hope to win these cases?
The case against the compounders looks to be cut and dry – violations of trade mark usage or misrepresentations about what is included in the drugs seem to be fairly fact-based and clearly delineated.
That said, the resulting remedies are unlikely to be large – many of these companies are tiny in contrast to a juggernaut like Eli Lilly, and with most companies already reeling from impact to their business models, there just isn't much that can be extracted without causing summary bankruptcy (if monetary awards are even sought).
The state of play seems to be unchanging in this area – compounded GLP1s are no longer an option, and until more patents expire getting access to affordable GLP1s will be difficult.